A Multi-Stage Approach for Evaluating and Selecting a Project Portfolio Based on Data Envelopment Analysis Under Uncertainty

Authors

    Mohammad Amin Bogheyri * MSc, Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran. Aminbogheyri@gmail.com
    Reza Mazloumi Takmehdash MSc, Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.

Keywords:

project portfolio selection, data envelopment analysis,, interval-valued fuzzy sets, project uncertainty

Abstract

A project portfolio is a collection of ongoing or future projects within an organization, and its optimal selection—as one of the critical decisions in project management—contributes to optimal resource allocation and improved organizational performance. Accurate evaluation of projects for inclusion in the project portfolio is essential; due to various factors and uncertainties such as project duration, modeling these uncertainties is necessary to achieve optimal decision-making. In this study, uncertainties are modeled using an interval-valued fuzzy valuation method, which enhances the precision of the decision-making process. The present research proposes a three-stage method for optimal project portfolio selection under uncertain conditions. In the first stage, projects are scored using the Marcus multi-criteria decision-making method while considering uncertainties. In the second stage, project efficiency is evaluated through cross-efficiency data envelopment analysis while accounting for uncertainty. In the third stage, a multi-objective mathematical model is designed and solved for selecting the optimal project portfolio, which—beyond optimizing cross-efficiency scores and multi-criteria decision-making—maximizes the overall profit of the portfolio while satisfying budget, time, and workforce capacity constraints. The results indicate that combining these methods significantly improves decision-making accuracy and enables optimal project selection considering organizational constraints and objectives in complex and uncertain environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Kerzner H. Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling: John Wiley & Sons; 2025.

2. Shundi H. Fuzzy set theory and its applications in industry and management. Tehran: Gostaresh-e Oloum-e Bonyadi Publications; 2002.

3. Mohagheghi V, Mousavi SM, Vahdani B. A new optimization model for project portfolio selection under interval-valued fuzzy environment. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering. 2015;40. doi: 10.1007/s13369-015-1779-6.

4. Mohagheghi V, Mousavi SM, Vahdani B. Innovative approaches in project portfolio management. Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University Press; 2016.

5. Stanković M, Stević Ž, Das DK, Subotić M, Pamučar D. A new fuzzy MARCOS method for road traffic risk analysis. Mathematics. 2020;8(3):457. doi: 10.3390/math8030457.

6. ForouzeshNejad A. A hybrid data-driven model for project portfolio selection problem based on sustainability and strategic dimensions: a case study of the telecommunication industry. Soft Computing. 2024;28(3):2409-29. doi: 10.1007/s00500-023-08445-w.

7. Yousefi S, Alizadeh A, Hayati J, Baghery M. HSE risk prioritization using robust DEA-FMEA approach with undesirable outputs: a study of automotive parts industry in Iran. Safety Science. 2018;102:144-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.015.

8. Banihashemi SA, Khalilzadeh M. Evaluating efficiency in construction projects with the TOPSIS model and NDEA method considering environmental effects and undesirable data. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering. 2021:1-17. doi: 10.1007/s40996-021-00669-w.

9. Chen W, Gai Y, Gupta P. Efficiency evaluation of fuzzy portfolio in different risk measures via DEA. Annals of Operations Research. 2018;269:103-27. doi: 10.1007/s10479-017-2411-9.

10. Singh AP, Ali M. Development of Bi-Objective Fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis Model to Measure the Efficiencies of Decision-Making Units. Mathematics. 2023;11(6):1402. doi: 10.3390/math11061402.

11. Singh AP, Yadav SP, Singh SK. A multi-objective optimization approach for DEA models in a fuzzy environment. Soft Computing. 2022;26(6):2901-12. doi: 10.1007/s00500-021-06627-y.

12. Tavana M, Keramatpour M, Santos-Arteaga FJ, Ghorbaniane E. A fuzzy hybrid project portfolio selection method using data envelopment analysis, TOPSIS and integer programming. Expert Systems with Applications. 2015;42(22):8432-44. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.06.057.

13. Zhang X, Goh M, Bai S, Wang Z. Risk response decisions for projects in project portfolios considering objective adjustments and project interdependencies. Kybernetes. 2024;53(7):2217-46. doi: 10.1108/K-09-2022-1344.

14. Yan S, Ji X. Portfolio selection model of oil projects under uncertain environment. Soft Computing. 2018;22:5725-34. doi: 10.1007/s00500-017-2619-2.

15. Tavana M, Khosrojerdi G, Mina H, Rahman A. A new dynamic two-stage mathematical programming model under uncertainty for project evaluation and selection. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 2020;149:106795. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2020.106795.

16. Toloo M, Nalchigar S, Sohrabi B. Selecting most efficient information system projects in presence of user subjective opinions: a DEA approach. Central European Journal of Operations Research. 2018;26(4):1027-51. doi: 10.1007/s10100-018-0549-4.

17. Tamimi S, Farhang. Management of Construction and Creation of an Intelligent Energy Production System for Buildings Utilizing Available Renewable Resources. Pars Project Management. 2025;1(1):124-50.

18. Silva J, Silva A, Araújo A, Silva A. Agile Project Management in Government Software Development: Addressing Challenges in Education Public Policy. 2025.

19. Sedashova O, Fedotova N. Conflict in the 21st Century in Project Team Management: Psychological Aspects. Scientific Notes of the Universitykrok. 2025(1(77)):309-16. doi: 10.31732/2663-2209-2025-77-309-316.

20. Chen W, Li SS, Mehlawat MK, Jia L, Kumar A. Portfolio selection using data envelopment analysis cross-efficiency evaluation with undesirable fuzzy inputs and outputs. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems. 2021;23:1478-509. doi: 10.1007/s40815-020-01045-y.

21. Kaniz RE, Lindon AR, Rahman MA, Hasan MA, Hossain MA. The Impact of Project Management Strategies on the Effectiveness of Digital Marketing Analytics for Start-Up Growth in the United States. Ijss. 2025;4(1):8-24. doi: 10.63544/ijss.v4i1.109.

22. Tavana M, Khalili-Damghani K, Sadi-Nezhad S. A fuzzy group data envelopment analysis model for high-technology project selection: A case study at NASA. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 2013;66(1):10-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2013.06.002.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-01

Submitted

2025-01-08

Revised

2025-04-01

Accepted

2025-04-08

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Bogheyri, M. A., & Mazloumi Takmehdash, R. . (2025). A Multi-Stage Approach for Evaluating and Selecting a Project Portfolio Based on Data Envelopment Analysis Under Uncertainty. Journal of Management and Business Solutions, 1-22. https://www.journalmbs.com/index.php/jmbs/article/view/77

Similar Articles

1-10 of 76

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.