Identification and Ranking of Factors Influencing the Prevention of Conspiracy Delusion with a Focus on Political Behavior in Iranian Government Organizations
Keywords:
Conspiracy delusion, organizational political behavior, socio-cultural factors, economic factors, organizational trustAbstract
Conspiracy delusion in Iranian government organizations—recognized as one of the most destructive psycho-social phenomena—is associated with intensified political behaviors, reduced social capital, weakened cooperation, and the deterioration of employees’ psychological well-being. It constitutes a serious obstacle to organizational development and performance improvement. This study was conducted with the aim of identifying and ranking the factors influencing the prevention of conspiracy delusion, with a specific focus on political behavior in Iranian government organizations. Using a mixed-methods approach, thematic analysis was applied in the qualitative phase, and the fuzzy DEMATEL method was employed in the quantitative phase. The statistical population consisted of 15 experts (senior and middle managers, human resource specialists, researchers in psychology and organizational behavior, and policymakers in the Civil Service sector) who were studied through in-depth semi-structured interviews and a fuzzy DEMATEL questionnaire. Data analysis was carried out using MAXQDA 2020 and MATLAB software. A total of 157 semantic statements were categorized into 17 sub-themes, which were subsequently grouped into six main dimensions: individual psychological factors, socio-cultural factors, political-institutional factors, informational-media factors, economic factors, and organizational-managerial factors. The findings indicated that socio-cultural factors (D+R = 3.524), organizational-managerial factors (D+R = 3.489), and political-institutional factors (D+R = 3.455) possess the highest overall importance and interaction levels, while economic factors (D+R = 1.878), with the highest D–R value (1.234), play the strongest causal and foundational role. For the first time, this study proposes a fully localized and multidimensional model for preventing conspiracy delusion that simultaneously integrates foundational economic factors and highly interactive upper-level dimensions within a unified causal network. By combining thematic analysis and fuzzy DEMATEL, the model enables precise and scientific prioritization of factors. This model can significantly contribute to reducing destructive political behaviors, enhancing organizational trust, improving cooperation, and promoting employees’ psychological well-being and performance in Iran’s public sector.
Downloads
References
1. Tam L, Lee H, Kim JN. Conspiratorial thinking in the workplace: how it happens and why it matters. Journal of Communication Management. 2024. doi: 10.1108/JCOM-12-2023-0139.
2. Shiri MR, Bagher Saleemi S, Shafiei B. Ethical and social factors influencing the formation of political behaviors. Ethics in Science and Technology. 2024;19:134-43.
3. Radpour F, Farrokh Seresht B, Kiakojouri D, Taghipour HA. Designing a Model of Effective Personality Dimensions on the Level of Managers' Communication Skills. Sociology of Education. 2024;10(1):21-30. doi: 10.22034/ijes.2023.2006845.1435.
4. Nera K. Analyzing the Causation Between Conspiracy Mentality and Belief in Conspiracy Theories. Zeitschrift für Psychologie. 2024. doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000533.
5. Kiakojouri D. Analysis of the relationships among Organizational Culture Indicators Using the DEMATEL Method at the Islamic Azad University in the West of Mazandaran Province. Journal of Dynamic Management Business Analysis. 2024;2(4):1-12. doi: 10.61838/dmbaj.2.4.1.
6. Kiakojouri D. Identifying the Dimensions and Components of the Cooperative Structure in Iran with the Approach of Waqf and Charity Affairs Based on Mixed Research. Journal of Endowment & Charity Studies. 2024;2(1):185-202. doi: 10.22108/ecs.2024.140454.1092.
7. Khodaparast M, Kiakojouri D, Mortazavi Amiri SJ, Jafari Kalarijani SA. Analyzing the dimensions and components of the developed model of competency-based successor training in education-oriented organizations with a meta-composite approach. Management and Educational Perspective. 2024;5(4):193-220. doi: 10.22034/jmep.2024.384659.1160.
8. Izadi M, Nazarpouri AH, Sepahvand R, Vahdati H, Hakak M. Designing and explaining a model of political behavior of managers in governmental organizations. Journal of Management and Educational Outlook. 2024;6(2):241-58.
9. Berenji S, Rahmaty M, Kiakojouri D. Designing a new behavioral model of blockchain technology acceptance in public banks. Journal of System Management (JSM). 2024;10(1):225-36.
10. Toribio-Flórez D, Green R, Sutton RM, Douglas KM. Does belief in conspiracy theories affect interpersonal relationships? The Spanish Journal of Psychology. 2023;26:e9. doi: 10.1017/SJP.2023.8.
11. Siemerink M. Repetition As a Weapon: What Is the Effect of the Illusory Truth Effect on Conspiracy Theories and Their Debunking? 2023.
12. Liekefett L, Christ O, Becker JC. Can conspiracy beliefs be beneficial? Longitudinal linkages between conspiracy beliefs, anxiety, uncertainty aversion, and existential threat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2023;49(2):167-79.
13. Ghanbari S, Nourollahi S. Structural equation modeling of political behaviors on organizational citizenship behavior with the mediation of job enthusiasm and job satisfaction in companies affiliated with the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting. Public Management Research. 2023;16(61):241-66.
14. Gagliardi L. The role of cognitive biases in conspiracy beliefs: A literature review. Journal of Economic Surveys. 2023.
15. Vojdani Tabatabai IS, Mohammadian F, Nobakht Ramazani Z. Testing the model of political behavior on decision-making of managers in sports organizations. Political Space Allocation. 2022;4(2):87-98.
16. Snaei M, Jafariyani H, Samanian M. Political behavior of government managers and its causes in organizations. Monthly Journal of Political Sociology of Iran. 2022;5(11):2894-911.
17. Pourpanahi Kal Tepeh M, Nourbakhsh P, Nourbakhsh M, Sepasi H. A paradigmatic model of political behavior of employees in Iranian sports organizations. Journal of Sports Management. 2022;14(2):322-03.
18. Van Prooijen JW, Song M. The cultural dimension of intergroup conspiracy theories. British Journal of Psychology. 2021;112(2):455-73. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12471.
19. Taheri MH, Ataei M. Designing a model of political behavior in governmental organizations of Iran. Scientific Journal of New Research Approaches in Management and Accounting. 2021;5(19):1142-62.
20. Kakeh Barayi I. Pathology of domestic research on political behavior in organizations with a meta-analytic approach. Management Development and Transformation. 2021(13):385-93.
21. Jolley D, Meleady R, Douglas KM. Exposure to intergroup conspiracy theories promotes prejudice which spreads across groups. British Journal of Psychology. 2020;111(1):17-35.
22. Douglas KM, Cichocka A, Sutton RM. Motivations, emotions and belief in conspiracy theories. Routledge handbook of conspiracy theories2020. p. 181-91.
23. Namjofard HR, Kamali MJ, Sabokrou M, Anjam Shoaa Z, Babaei H. Designing a Political Behavior Management Model Based on Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Journal of Management and Education Perspective. 2025;7(1):256-81.
24. Khazaei Pool G, Kiakojouri D, Tghipourian MJ. Presenting a model of political behavior based on the theory of shadow management in the public sector with a hybrid method. Journal of Management and Educational Perspective. 2025;6(4):341-68.
25. Deep V, Kaur S, Pritpal B, Bhullar S. Organizational political behavior and job satisfaction: an empirical evidence from Indian universities. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences. 2025. doi: 10.1108/JEAS-02-2024-0060.
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Hosein Heidari Ardi (Author); Reza Verij Kazemi; Davood Kia Kojouri (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.